Washington laments loss of ag trade with Cuba

August 2, 2013 in City



Washington laments loss of ag trade with Cuba

Tightening of embargo made exporting too costly

Kaitlin Gillespie The Spokesman-Review



HAVANA –The aisle of a Havana grocery store is lined with shelf after

shelf of cheddar-flavored Pringles. At the deli counter, there are

dozens of boxes of frozen fish sticks. Down another aisle, a brand of

baby wipes fill the shelves.



The produce section, meanwhile, is almost bare. A few bags of frozen

fruits and vegetables sit in a glass case.



These limited choices underscore Cuba's struggle – it's a country unable

to feed itself but whose political history makes leaders reluctant to

work with the United States.



About a third of Cuba's land is dedicated to agriculture, most of it to

grow sugar. Cuban farmers also grow tobacco, citrus, coffee, rice, beans

and potatoes. But it's not enough to feed 11.2 million people.



For years, Washington farmers have helped.



Cuba imports about 80 percent of its food.In spite of an embargo against

the communist country, Cubans depend increasingly on imports from the

United States. For years, the U.S. was the main provider of food to

Cuba. While the U.S. hasn't boasted that title since 2010, a

representative from the U.S. Interests Section in Havana said American

agricultural exports to Cuba have increased by about 15 percent per year

during the last three years.



But that growth left out Washington, which once counted Cuba among its

top five export markets for peas. The state hasn't sent fruits or

vegetables there since 2007 when a crackdown on the 51-year-old embargo

that occurred in 2004 helped dry up Washington exports.



Former U.S. Rep. George Nethercutt, R-Wash., and Sen. Maria Cantwell,

D-Wash., were among those who pushed to reopen trade routes between Cuba

and the U.S. in the late 1990s. That resulted in an exception applied to

the embargo in 2001 allowing the United States to ship food and medicine

to Cuba in exchange for cash paid upfront.



After that trade deal, Washington exports of peas, lentils, cherries and

apples steadily increased.



"I think it was good for Americans, good for farmers, good for Cubans,

and I thought it was good policy," Nethercutt said.



Now, it's too expensive for Washington farmers to ship produce to Cuba

due to added costs , said Robert Hamilton, Gov. Jay Inslee's trade

policy advise.



"It's not worth it," Hamilton said.



Nethercutt maintains that reopening trade with Cuba would benefit

Washington farmers.



"The best thing any member of Congress or the Senate can do is assist

the people you represent," Nethercutt said. "If it's been restricted,

it's a function of … members of our state delegation to fight like crazy

for the Obama administration to take action to encourage sales."



And even though Cuba's market is small, with a population of about 11

million people, Hamilton said the agriculture sector isn't going to

refuse that market. "Every little bit helps," he said.



Only a few blocks from the Havana grocery store stands a small fruit

stand, bustling with Cubans doing their shopping. There are no apples or

peas here; this is all locally grown fruit that thrives in the Caribbean.



All the produce sold here goes through the government, the owner said.

Business has been steady in the three years she's run the shop. But, "My

business would be better if more of the product came from other

countries," she said.



Editor's Note: City desk intern Kaitlin Gillespie studied in Havana,

Cuba in May with The Edward R. Murrow College of Communication at

Washington State University.



Source: "Washington laments loss of ag trade with Cuba - Spokesman.com -

Aug. 2, 2013" -

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2013/aug/02/washington-laments-loss-of-ag-trade-with-cuba/